![]() ![]() A website called recently posted a San Francisco Bay Area map that used Webster’s data and other data with permission. Webster’s maps and data already have fanned out online. The property tax bill was $4,850 in 2020, according to county records. is a 2 bedroom, 1-and-a-half bathroom, 1,080 square foot home next to Beach Flats Park. The property tax bill was $4,867 in 2020, according to county records. It also has an ocean view at Mitchell’s Cove. ![]() A two-story home at 1514 West Cliff Drive has 5 bedrooms and 4-and-a-half bathrooms on 3,000 square feet of living area. The Santa Cruz County data shows big differences in what homeowners on the same street pay in property taxes, and it also shows owners who pay the same bill for completely different homes.įor example, at least one homeowner on West Cliff Drive pays about the same $4,800 annual property tax bill that another homeowner pays in the Beach Flats neighborhood. “The data is public but in a very unwieldy format, so the whole project seemed to lend itself to data visualization.” “Usually when I read about an issue that’s controversial and has viewpoints that I don’t see as consistent, my reaction is to find the data myself,” Webster said. “My goal here is to present the facts and the data and allow other people or other projects to draw their own conclusions,” Webster said Monday. About four weeks later, Webster’s database was online with color-coded figures that showed gaps of $10,000 or more in annual property taxes - sometimes on the same street. Santa Cruz Local member and housing advocate Kyle Kelley delivered him Santa Cruz County data. San Mateo-based engineer Ian Webster started in September by culling public data from tax assessor’s websites in San Francisco Bay Area counties. SANTA CRUZ > Santa Cruz County residents have a new way to visualize property tax disparities with a searchable map that matches tax data with residential and commercial properties. The proposition would allow counties to raise taxes on commercial properties worth more than $3 million at more than the current annual 2% limit. 28 newsletter inaccurately stated that Proposition 15 would allow tax hikes on residential properties. ( - Screenshot)Įditor’s Note: Santa Cruz Local’s Oct. I would highly recommend Bill and most definitely call on him again for analysis and legal services related to parcel legality and any other related entitlement work.Property taxes vary widely around Pleasure Point. Seligman’s experience as Counsel for municipalities, enables him to provide a risk-adjusted assessment and instill reasonable expectations of the process by communicating the interests from both sides of the table. His legal competence, deep understanding of CA Subdivision Map Act laws and Zoning Regulations, gave me the support I needed to get my Application approved in the face of many people that told me NO. It is ultimately my dream to become a small time and respected local developer, and it was clear from the first meeting that Bill validated the tenacity and fortitude I had for my vision despite any potential generation difference I may have had as a client. Words cannot express how much I appreciate Bill’s diligent analysis, hard work, and unbiased approach toward the challenge at-hand. I would highly recommend Bill and most definitely call on him again for analysis and legal services related to parcel legality and any other related entitlement work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |